This should not be construed as medical advice. I am a retired Board Certified Plastic Surgeon.
France calls for removal of thousands of risky breast implantsThe horror show begins again. I stopped offering breast implants many years ago when I realized that lawyers and sensationalists would terrorize any patient with fears about what were great tools by ethical companies. Well Dow went out of the implant business and now we have what may be a bunch of criminals who have hurt the world with unethical use of non-medical grade silicone material for use in the human body.
Investigators say the company Poly Implant Prothese used cheaper industrial silicone for the implants instead of medical silicone to save money. The implants were pulled from the market last year and the company is being liquidated.
I do not know the particulars of this situation, but what gives? If this is the case, the offenders who put that material into a device intended for use in humans should be put into prison. If any marketing individuals or physicians were knowledgeable about such a tactic, they should be put away also. Were these implants less expensive for the patient or was the added "savings" pocketed by the company? If any of the surgeons knew that the implants were made of non-medical grade materials, they should not only lose their licenses but also be put in prison. I only hope the scam was from the French implant company alone.
It boggles my mind that France would cover only French patients with this problem. Any solutions should be for any patient and doctor tricked by such methods. This "French" solution, even if warranted, will spread panic in any person having such an implant.
Will a non-medical grade silicone hurt someone? Maybe yes, maybe no. It depends what safety factors were skipped in the manufacturing process that differentiates the higher safety factor for human use. What chemicals might be there be, what long term changes are expected, what other issues were skipped by this "cheaper" process? That is what should be discussed. Not this panic creating sensationalism. In reaction to this panic:
UK says no need for mass removal of breast implants.
France Offers to Pay for Breast-Implant Removal is an unprecedented step. Over 1,000 ruptures in 30,000 implants statement is missing how long the implants were there. This is supposed to be twice the frequency of other implants in use today. That was part of the risk discussion about using implants from the beginning.
The claim is that the removal is preventive:
Bertrand insisted the removals would be "preventive" and not urgent, and French health authorities said they had found nothing to link the implants to nine cases of cancer in women. The death last month of a woman who had the implants and developed a rare cancer had catalyzed worries.
If they should be removed, why? What are the specific risks? What was found in the analysis of the non-medical grade materials? And for the rest of the tens of thousands of patients who are not in France, why are the French patients being covered and the rest not? If that country feels obligated to pay for the removal for French patients, what is their obligation for the rest of the world? What are the risks of the implant compared to alcohol or tobacco?
The Man Who Sold Sketchy Breast Implants has a discussion about the person involved who sold the devices. I like this quote:
A plastic surgeon who knew him has claimed that Mas’s previous line of work, fittingly, was as a butcher, and that he had no past medical experience. The plastic surgeon added that he personally didn’t use Mas’s implants because they were so cheap he suspected they were of low quality.
There is the protection factor of better medicine. If something is so much cheaper, why? What shortcuts or advances made it so much less expensive? Better surgeons do try to protect their patients.
I am saddened by this turn of events. Implants are a great tool that can perform a spectacular service when risks are discussed and understood. However at the time I stopped using them, we were not dealing with unethical manufacturers.

This is supposed to be an implant by that PIP French company.
What are your thoughts, or comments?
Hope this helps,
Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More About Plastic Surgery and Female Breast Sculpture